By Scout Nelson
South Dakota has not set any official goals to reduce pollution in its rivers and streams. This is a concern because over three-quarters of the stream miles tested in the state are unsafe for uses like swimming, fishing, or supporting aquatic life.
According to the 2024 surface water quality report by the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR), 78% of the stream miles tested were not healthy. These streams fail to meet water quality standards due to common pollutants.
These include fertilizer runoff from farms, soil erosion from agriculture and natural causes, and E. coli bacteria from animal waste, including livestock and wildlife.
Even though South Dakota requires a permit to discharge pollutants into surface waters, problems have occurred. Staff shortages have led to fewer inspections and expired permits, making it harder to control pollution levels. These gaps have caused frequent permit violations.
Unlike other states such as Minnesota and Iowa, which have created official targets to reduce pollution, South Dakota’s DANR has not yet shared any clear goals.
Officials have also not responded to recent questions asking about plans to reduce water pollution statewide.
It is important to know that surface water in South Dakota is considered public property, not private land. That means the state is responsible for protecting water quality for everyone’s benefit.
Setting clear goals and improving inspections could help protect South Dakota’s streams and rivers in the future. Many people hope the state will soon follow the example of others by setting strong pollution control targets.
Photo Credit: pexels-adam-sondel
Categories: South Dakota, General, Sustainable Agriculture